M. Sc. David Ehrlich

Aktuelle Forschung

2021 

Easing Restrictions During Vaccine Scarcity. How Mitigation Measures Help Tackling Associated Moral and Behavioral Challenges 

In an exciting interdisciplinary exchange, made possible by the BMBF-funded project CwiC: Coping with Certainty, we had the chance to cooperate with colleagues from the Legal and Ethical Sciences. Based on the Covid pandemic example, we studied how testing and and other mitigating measures can help to achieve fairer and better access to personal freedom rights, when not everyone has had a chance to get vaccinated, yet, and which challenges must be overcome on this route:

Zusammenfassung

Background: When vaccines became first available during the Covid-19 pandemic, their demand significantly exceeded their supply. In consequence, the access to vaccines, initially, was distributed unequally. At the same time, governments started easing pandemic restrictions for vaccinated and recovered persons and restoring their freedoms since their risk of transmitting the virus is significantly reduced.
Evidence: We show that restoring freedoms for vaccinated and recovered persons – while upholding restrictions for the rest of the population – is morally unfair during vaccine scarcity. Further, it may yield unintended side-effects, including perverse incentives, growing rifts in society, and the expansion of marginalization.
Policy Options & Recommendations: We recommend accompanying easing for vaccinated and recovered individuals by mitigation measures for those who are neither vaccinated nor recovered. We propose, first, to temporarily lift the same restrictions for negative-tested individuals, as for vaccinated or recovered people. Second, the state must ensure broad and easy access to testing for everyone – free of charge.
Conclusion: If done right, these mitigation measures create (at least temporarily) equal access to freedom for everybody – solving the moral problem of unfair access to freedoms and counteracting possible negative consequences.

Zitation:

Tretter, M., Ehrlich, D.B., & von Ulmenstein, U. (2021). Easing Restrictions During Vaccine Scarcity. How Mitigation Measures Help Tackling Associated Moral and Behavioral Challenges. Public Health Reviewshttps://dx.doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604269

Forschungsinteressen

  • Forschungsprofil des BMBF-geförderten und interdisziplinären Projekts "Coping with Certainty – How Artificial Intelligence improves predictability and challenges normative perspectives"
  • Verhaltensökonomie
  • Nudging
  • Digitalökonomie und gesellschaftliche, politische Auswirkungen

Lehre 2019-heute

Betreute Abschlussarbeiten

  • "Increasing Influenza Vaccination Uptake – Nudging as a Promising Tool“
  • "Nudging Sustainable Food Consumption: A Literature Review and Nudge Design"
  • "Increasing Organ Donation – The Promises of Nudges"
  • "Conflicting Interests, and Incentives in Financial Consulting"
  • "Terms of Service – did you read? Using Transparency as a Nudge in the Digital Age"
  • "How are Social Norms Affected by the AI Revolution? Customers' Awareness of Privacy Issues Related to Digital Assistants"

 

Lebenslauf

  • 2019–heute: Doktorand und wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Lehrstuhl für Politische Ökonomie, KIT
  • 2015–2018: M.Sc. in Economics an der Universität Heidelberg
  • 2016–2017: M.Sc. in Economics an der Universität Florenz, Italien
  • 2011–2015: B.Sc. in VWL an der Universität Mannheim